Stamped snapshot

How The New York Times v. OpenAI and Microsoft copyright case ultimately is resolved

This snapshot shows a condensed version of Mantic's analysis — the full breakdown is available in the Mantic app. The live forecast may have changed.

Settlement before trial

53.5%

As of 1 Sept 2026, 18:19 UTC

Outcome probabilities

Settlement before trial53.5%
OpenAI and Microsoft win on fair use17.8%
The New York Times wins and the verdict stands14.0%
Settlement after a trial verdict or during appeal10.4%
Case ends on other grounds without a merits ruling4.4%

Rationale

Full access

I predict a 54% probability that the New York Times copyright lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft will reach a settlement before a trial verdict, driven by mounting litigation costs and the high procedural risk of pending sanctions for evidence destruction.

Forecast record

Forecast context

Clarifications

Resolve to the outcome that best matches the case's final procedural posture. 'Settlement before trial' means the case ends by settlement before any trial verdict is reached. 'Settlement after trial or during appeal' means the parties settle after a trial verdict or while an appeal is pending. 'OpenAI/Microsoft win on fair use' means a final judgment for OpenAI and Microsoft on the merits based on fair use, including any appellate affirmance. 'The New York Times verdict upheld' means The New York Times obtains a verdict or final judgment on the merits and that result is not reversed on appeal. 'Dismissal on other grounds' means the case ends without a merits ruling for either side, including dismissal for lack of standing, jurisdiction, procedural defects, or other non-fair-use grounds.

Want the full analysis?

The complete analysis, including full reasoning, news and data sources, and live forecast updates, is available in the Mantic app.

Contact Mantic